Online voting: Boon or bane for democracy?

 

Personal Notes:

This article includes some statistics and tables related to online voting.

Table 1 is about internet use in Eastern Europe.(What percent of individuals have regular internet access in Eastern Europe?)

Table 2 contains the statistics of Voter turnout in Estonian parliamentary elections between 1992 – 2015. Table 2 shows that 6% of people voted online in 2007, whereas this percentage is increased to 31%  in 2015, and total turnaround is also increased.

 

Abstract: Estonia is the only country in the world where all voters can vote online in national elections. In the 2015 election, 31% of voters did so. This paper discusses the sociology and politics of online voting in Estonia. I first show that online voting is a partisan project. Liberal, conservative, and social democratic parties support online voting as a way of modernizing the electoral system, while populist and agrarian parties oppose it as a tool for political manipulation. I then show that online voting is demographically and politically biased. Online voters are more urban, richer, and better-educated than conventional voters and non-voters. The opposition left-populist Center Party receives fewer votes online than the governing market-liberal Reform Party. This is a bad thing for democracy and Estonia should discontinue online voting.

Full text article: Online voting: Boon or bane for democracy?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s